The Curious Case of Euclidean Zoning
Allen Chin • Apr 23, 2022

Is raising the interest rate enough to cool the housing market?

“So…what do you think is going to happen to the real estate market?” Of all of the questions I get as a mortgage broker working in Toronto, this is the one that I am increasingly hearing more and more. After each appointment discussing mortgage situations, clients would often end with this simple question. It’s the same question that I also see dominating news segments. I see it on the forums as people express their frustrations with housing and living conditions. As a mortgage broker, I also see what’s happening from the rental side to first time home buyers to investors and back again. It’s very difficult to ignore what’s going on as ‘normal business’ when we have seen home prices accelerate in appreciation at an alarming pace while the cost of living and inflation continue to rise. I have also seen the rhetoric’s used as ‘solutions’ to the ‘housing crisis’, such as the increase in interest rates to looking at penalizing foreign buyers. While increasing interest rates will help, I’m sure all of you are familiar with the term “band aid” solution, it does nothing to solve the underlying issue. Supply and demand. While supply and demand is more of an economic term, but when applied to the housing market, the tools that affect supply and demand are beyond just interest rates (monetary policy), and needs to account for the actual policies that govern how, what and where we build our cities.


Euclidean Zoning – Describes essentially how our entire “North American” cities are built and planned. It is a method of urban planning which divides land uses into each of their respective zones. This was done during the industrial period as to prevent houses to be built right next to industrial plants. For the most part this worked, and it helped build and develop communities. All of this changed during the introduction of the National Highway acts throughout the 1920’s, which lead to a new development phenomenon known as the “Urban Sprawl”. (Partially formed by the “American Dream” of being able to own a home with a white picket fence, with a car in every garage.)


Fast forward to today, and we have two very distinct type of cities. Ones that were built prior to the 1920’s which still allowed for dynamic zoning laws that have been “grandfathered” to allow for mixed use and higher density exceptions, vs cities and towns after 1920’s that adhered to the urban planning methods of focused zoning. More specifically single family homes. The detached single family home became an icon, that it dominates the zoning allowances for all ‘modern’ cities. However, doing this forces a few issues,


Single family home zoning forces other types of zoning away and are determined to be set at a certain distance. Sometimes knows as setbacks. (Ironic isn’t?) As such, if you have a commercial development, it would be situated outside of the single family zoned areas. This type of design is very typical of cities like Mississauga, London (Ontario) where you have many “strodes” (think of streets, but are actually roads for cars and not pedestrian friendly with wide intersections) Typical design cues will involve large parking lots that are typically bigger than the buildings themselves and a lot of 1 to 2 story buildings with higher density buildings around the core.


The fundamental problem with this urban design is that the plan is designed around the automobile and not the person. It assumes that each person will have a car that they can travel to the designated zoned areas for your amenities like groceries, shopping, entertainment, even where you work. However, doing this causes another major fundamental issue; congestion. Since the amenities are all grouped in areas, everyone needs to go to the same place, which exacerbates the problem of paving our lands into parking lots.

In fact, the case for Suburban design planning is currently being revised to address these issues as they are readily becoming apparent as the city begins to age, and the large amounts of asphalt infrastructure now needs to be maintained by taxes generated by a low density area. It is not a surprise that the budgets of these cities are largely skewed towards maintenance, leaving very little funds for anything else.


What does this all mean? It means that we really need to assess the way we build our cities and to what scale. Focusing on density does not have to mean 30+ story condominium buildings. Now termed the "missing middle" properties like duplexes, triplexes, to small to mid rise apartments and mixed used (live/work) buildings are great answers to gentle intensification, increased walk ability while decreasing vehicular congestion.  One doesn't have to look far to see great examples of these. Toronto is already made up multiple 'villages' and Montreal already was largely built this way to accommodate the density during it's intensification phase. Now expanding it even further, giving Montreal the title of the "most European Canadian city". We have the knowledge, the tools to make this happen, but change is never easy, and often requires communities to come together in solidarity for this to occur.


“We expect too much of new buildings, and too little of ourselves.”

- Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities



By Allen Chin 04 Dec, 2023
Guardian Mortgage's CEO Patrick Gill featured NewsTalk 960AM
Patrick Gill | TEDxUW
By Shane Serra 30 Oct, 2023
Patrick Gill shares time tested strategies that will help you pay it off faster and save money. Strategies that if you implement, will help you make debt a friend again.

Design Exhibitions

There are new exhibitions at the National Museum every month. Check out what's on when you're in town.

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

1

2

Share by: